Kyle Kang vs Sam Thompson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
L W W L L W L W W LHead To Head: Kang 2 - 0 Thompson
They have played 4 sets in total, with Kang winning 4 and Thompson winning 0. The last match between Kang and Thompson was at the M25 Edwardsville, 31-07-2024, First, Hard with Kyle Kang getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kyle Kang | 2 |
| Sam Thompson | 0 |
M25 Edwardsville(31-07-2024)
7
6
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Halys VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-1 |
Stats 
Kyle Kang
Player
Sam Thompson
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Sam Thompson
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:21:0 | Average Match Time | 1:21:0 |
| 55% (60/109) | 1st Serve % | 47% (51/108) |
| 77% (46/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (31/51) |
| 67% (33/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (27/57) |
| 64% (7/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 46% (50/108) | Return Points Win % | 28% (30/109) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Kyle Kang
55%
(
65 of
118)
1st Serve %
50%
(
60 of
121)
13
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
58%
(
31 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
37 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
124
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
80
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Kyle Kang
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
60%
(
73 of
121)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
121)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
78)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
121)
127
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Kyle Kang
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Alexander Kotzen
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ryan Fishback
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gavin Young
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Colin Sinclair
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
92)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(4) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Sam Thompson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Flynn Caruana
Player
Sam Thompson
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 7-6(3) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mustafa Ege Sik
Player
Sam Thompson
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
3
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dominik Wijntjes
Player
Sam Thompson
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Sam Thompson
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Thompson
Player
Perry Gregg
46%
(
39 of
85)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Sam Thompson
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (61/51) | Win/Loss | 39% (11/17) |
| 53% (136/120) | Sets Win/Loss | 38% (23/38) |
| 51% (1263/1206) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (280/324) |
| 55% (40/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) |
| 62% (21/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 233 | Aces Total | 25 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 188 | Total Double Faults | 34 |
| 1:38:11 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 453.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 107.5 |
| 59% (4145/7027) | 1st Serve % | 57% (315/550) |
| 66% (2756/4145) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (214/315) |
| 51% (1478/2882) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (106/235) |
| 41% (295/720) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (19/41) |
| 41% (2840/7002) | Return Points Win % | 36% (186/520) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31% (4/9) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (57/42) | Futures W/L | 39% (11/17) |
| 54% (58/108) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (11/28) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (16/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 53% (16/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 80% (4/5) |
| 86% (56/48) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (10/9) |
| 14% (56/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (10/1) |
| 23% (56/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (18/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
